Thursday, January 31, 2008

Check the Shelf Life of Spices [How To]



 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 


spices.jpgThat jar of paprika might have lasted you through college, but is it still fresh? The Unclutterer organization blog rounds up helpful links to freshness checkers that decode the numbers and letters that replace actual dates on some containers. Here's the list of spice-maker links:

Even better, one commenter points us to The Epicentre's "Spice Advice" page, which provides storage tips and general guidelines on what you can keep and what can be tossed. Get rid of a few dead-taste spices and your cupboards might just become a little more navigable.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Walgreens has a printable online coupon ... [Deals]



 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Chris Walters on 1/30/08

con-tinywalgreenscoupon.jpg Walgreens has a printable online coupon for $5 off a purchase of $20 or more, good for tomorrow only. (Thanks to Mike!)



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Scientific Study: Double Dipping Is As Gross As You Think It Is [Science]

looks like consumerist picked it up from NYT...

 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Meg Marco on 1/30/08

If you object to George Costanza's habit of double dipping—now you have a scientific study to back it up.

The study was conducted by Prof. Paul L. Dawson, a food microbiologist, who decided to experiment with "double dipping" after watching a Seinfeld re-run in which a character named "Timmy" objects to George's dubious dipping habits.

Professor Dawson told the New York Times that he expected "little or no microbial transfer" as a result of double dipping.

He was wrong.

Double dippers are just as gross as you've always suspected:

The team of nine students instructed volunteers to take a bite of a wheat cracker and dip the cracker for three seconds into about a tablespoon of a test dip. They then repeated the process with new crackers, for a total of either three or six double dips per dip sample. The team then analyzed the remaining dip and counted the number of aerobic bacteria in it. They didn't determine whether any of the bacteria were harmful, and didn't count anaerobic bacteria, which are harder to culture, or viruses.

There were six test dips: sterile water with three different degrees of acidity, a commercial salsa, a cheese dip and chocolate syrup.

On average, the students found that three to six double dips transferred about 10,000 bacteria from the eater's mouth to the remaining dip.

Each cracker picked up between one and two grams of dip. That means that sporadic double dipping in a cup of dip would transfer at least 50 to 100 bacteria from one mouth to another with every bite. Yuck. So, what now? "The way I would put it is, before you have some dip at a party, look around and ask yourself, would I be willing to kiss everyone here? Because you don't know who might be double dipping, and those who do are sharing their saliva with you," says Professor Dawson.

Dip Once or Dip Twice? [NYT via WSJ Health Blog]



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Monitoring Body-Burdens



 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 

via KK Lifestream on 1/28/08

I've been researching how to quantify the level of exotic, synthetic chemicals which all our bodies pick up while living in a manufactured world. All modern citizens carry around traces of chemicals we are exposed to and were not born with. A few years ago, this internal pollution was given the name Human Body Burden. It is quantified by measuring up to 700 different synthetic chemicals or heavy metals than have been found in human blood, including the blood of infants in the US. The scientists engaged in the research call it Human Bio Monitoring (HBM).

Currently the costs of a doing a full-spectrum assay for an individual is on the order of $10,000, so very few individuals have been surveyed. Because of small numbers, the actual significance of the results are still uncertain -- but no one is happy that any of them are present. 

Duncanchemical

David Ewing Duncan is a Bay area-based journalist who has been quantifying his body by getting his gene's sequenced and blood tested. (His results shown above.)

Duncan wrote about his body burden in a recent issue of National Geographic, and his report is a fair document of what kinds of things this monitoring will produce. He also goes through his life to offer some suggestions of how exposure to these chemicals might have occurred. He has an entertaining time trying to track down where in his past he may have picked up high levels of obscure industrial chemicals. Duncan has turned this self-examination into a forth-coming book (fall 2008) called The Experimental Man: A Molecular Autobiography. His powerpoint presentation on this experiment so far can be downloaded here.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Monday, January 28, 2008

Snopes Pushing Zango Adware



 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 

via Slashdot by kdawson on 1/28/08

DaMan writes "Here's something that isn't an urban legend — Snopes, the popular urban legends reference site, has been pushing adware, for at least 6 months, to users via ads displayed on its Web site. No one seems to have called them on it until recently."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Dyson DC07 Cyclone Upright Vacuum Cleaner - $219.99

you know you want one.......

 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 


The old ones still remember a time when their kind ruled the floors. It was a golden age for dust, dirt, and dander, when a thriving microbial civilization seemed destined for eternal mastery of its domain. Throughout the carpets, tile, and hardwood, their numbers grew every day. Their greatest joy came when a cloud of them ascended into the air to infect the breath and food of the hapless human inhabitants. Oh, how they laughed! The occasional vacuuming was little more than a loud nuisance, perhaps claiming a few victims here and there but leaving the fundamental filth intact.

Then came the dawn of the Dyson.

Never before had the tiny denizens of the floor felt such awful power. Pet hair, crumbs, and mites that had thrived since time immemorial were whisked unceremoniously away. With 250 airwatts of suction power, the Dyson DC07’s Root Cyclone technology devastated this disgusting civilization where lesser vacuums had barely troubled it. Its 14-foot hose and 31-foot cord left the filth nowhere to hide. One by one, ten by ten, hundreds by hundreds, the victims piled up in the Dyson’s clear bin, serving a gruesome warning to the rest. A few fortunate survivors found refuge in obscure crannies of the house. But isolated, alone, even they cannot survive forever.

Pitiless, unforgiving, hygienic, the Dyson DC07 Cyclone Upright Vacuum Cleaner banished all manner of foulness and impurity. The old ones call it “the Great Destroyer” and dream of a distant future where they will once again infect your floors, your home, your lungs, and ultimately your life. Is the mighty Dyson DC07 going to let that happen?

Warranty: 6 Month Dyson

Features:

  • Suction power – 250 airwatts (constant)
  • Root Cyclone Technology – Uses cyclonic separation to remove dirt from the air with out using a filter.
  • Lifetime HEPA Filtration – HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filters can remove 99.97% of airborne particles 0.3 micrometers in diameter. This can trap fine particles such as pollen or other allergens.
  • Certified Asthma Friendly – Air expelled from a Dyson DC07 has up to 150 times less mold and bacteria than the air you breathe.
  • Brush Bar – Will protect delicate floors and rugs
  • Easy Empty Bin – Button controlled system allows for a clean and hygienic way to discard dust and dirt it traps.
  • Clear Bin – You can see when the bin should be emptied. No need to buy specific vacuum bags.
  • Reversible Wand – Wand and hose extend 14 feet for stair and high-reach cleaning while the vacuum reminds upright and stable.
  • Auto-Adjusting Height – Adjusts automatically to your floor type.
  • On Board Tool Storage – Brush, stair, and crevice tools store on the machine.
  • 31 foot power cable
  • 44 foot reach
  • 0.89 gallon bin capacity
  • 19 pounds


Price: 219.9900

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Sunday, January 27, 2008

How To Find a Doctor

this is what i was talking about...

 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 

via KK Lifestream on 1/14/08

We have a pediatrician doctor we love. But our family doctor has been a revolving door of fine people who last only a few years and then move on. I had been asking my friends for suggestions of great primary care doctors without getting many recommendations. I decided to ask Dr. Joseph Stirt, the "World's most popular blogging anesthesiologist"  what is the best way to find a great doctor. He wrote me a lengthy reply , which I thought useful enough to post for others. Blogger that he is, Joe started with a story:

Q. What do you call the guy who finished last in his medical school class?

A. "Doctor"

With that introduction, a true story. My dorm floor advisor in my sophomore year of undergraduate work was a fourth year UCLA medical school student. A few years later, I  started med school myself at UCLA. I kept in touch with my old dorm house advisor, who was a super nice, cool guy, surfer, etc.  Years later an apartment I lived in in Westwood, near UCLA,  found me occupying a one-bedroom unit right above a guy who'd recently graduated from UCLA med school. He and his crazy flight attendant girlfriends drove me insane with their loud music and screaming, object-throwing fights and slamming doors. I happened to mention the guy's name to my old dorm floor advisor one day, and he started laughing. Why? Because my downstairs neighbor had finished last – dead last — in his graduating medical school class (same class as my ex-advisor) and was considered a complete flake/bozo by everyone in the class: no one could believe he got his M.D.

The downstairs  guy went into private practice and was obviously making a shitload of money, judging by the Ferrari, etc., and his drop dead gorgeous suits. I continued to live in the upstairs apartment and I'd talk to him occasionally . He would tell  me little  medical facts that were so bogus, I'd laugh to myself.
Fast forward a few years. An issue of then very popular Los Angeles magazine featured as its cover story "The Best Doctors in Los Angeles." Guess what? My downstairs neighbor was named the top family doctor in L.A! I wouldn't have let that guy housesit my pet turtle, he was such an idiot.

But you know why he was voted the best doctor?

1. His patients loved him, as did the doctors he referred to.

2. Professionally he was very personable and interested in each person he cared for.

3. He was always available by pager or phone.

4. He was handsome and well-dressed and looked the part of a doctor.

5. He never rushed through his appointments but always took as much time as his patients needed.

6. He was smart enough to realize he was stupid and so referred anything at all out of his expertise, which was essentially nil, to specialists: the specialists thus named him as being excellent ($$$ is how you spell referrals) and his patients thus thought he was even more caring.

There are many doctors out there who are loved by their patients who are actually incompetent. That's why you don’t really want a doctor "that you love." Because that is precisely the wrong attribute to be most desired, or even considered important. What you should be seeking is a doctor who is competent, and able to understand when she/he needs another opinion.

Doctor House

So how do you find a competent doctor? What should you do?

1. If you're in a city with a teaching hospital, call the department you want a doctor in (Family practice, ob-gyn, urology, whatever).

2. Ask them for the name of recent chief residents who stayed in the area and are now in private practice.

3. Call them and make an appointment: you've found your doctor.

Chief residents are chosen by both fellow residents and faculty: they are always good and interpersonally skilled — because they have to be. They're also clinically adept and knowledgeable. That’s what you want and need.

But I am an anesthesiologist. You couldn't find me this way. Anesthesiologists are unfindable — as a rule they're assigned to cases and you haven't a clue who's putting you to sleep — or if they're any good.

How to get a good one? At a teaching hospital, call the anesthesiology department and ask to speak to the chief resident.  Push — you'll get to her/him. Ask the individual to personally do your/your child's anesthesia. They'll be delighted to do so and flattered as hell.  If your health care is out of a hospital and in a private setting? Ask your surgeon who's the best anesthesiologist in the group. He/she'll say they'll all excellent. You'll reply, which one would you select to do your anesthesia? There's your guy.

Although I had never thought of this method to find our family doctor we did use to find a specialist for my wife. She had broken her wrist falling on a hard tennis court, and sadly the severed wrist  bone was not healing after 6 months. She was due for another very technical surgery to rebreak it, clean it and bind it in metal. Slowly, through a number of clues, I began to conclude that the doctor who set her bone in the emergency, and was overseeing her non-healing, may not be the best surgeon in the world to do this, although he thought he was. Another doctor friend suggested this simple procedure. Call up the operating room at the hospital the doctor works at and ask the chief nurse "when was the last time doctor X did this operation (which I described)?" In our case the answer was "about five years ago." Yikes!  No way, buddy.

We got a lead for another doctor, who gave the correct answer: "I just did this exact operation this morning. I do it several times a week. It’s my speciality." She was great and quickly healed it.

The answer to how to find a doctor, then, is to not to ask other patients, nor just any non-specialist doctor, but to ask either  a chief resident or a chief nurse  who they recommend for themselves because they are the ones who must deal with the competencies of other doctors. But you have to solicit the recommendation in a way such as they are not dissing their colleagues. When was the last time they did X, would you use them for your child?

Doctors are human beings. They ALL make mistakes. You can’t expect infallible care. Even the best will be wrong sometimes. But some are more expert than others. Discovering and evaluating competency way outside your own is very difficult.  The key is to ask, who cares? In this case, who cares about doctor competency? Chief residents and chiefs of operating rooms do. So you ask them.

If anyone else has a good heuristic for finding great doctors (or other specialists), I’d like to hear about it.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Find Recipes to Satisfy Your Cravings at Cookthink [Cooking]



 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 


cookthink.png
Web site Cookthink turns your cravings into reality, matching recipes with cravings by ingredient, cuisine, dish, or mood. For example, if you were to head to the site aching for something—anything—that will hit your "basily" mood, just tell Cookthink that's what you want and it'll give you a handful of recipes designed to satisfy that craving. You can give Cookthink more than one requirement to meet your craving, and it does the standard recipe-by-ingredients lookup as well, so in all it's a one-stop shop for finding meals based on what you have and what cravings you're looking to satisfy. Most of the recipes, I should add, look mighty tasty.



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Meg would like to thank the commenters on ... [Thank You]



 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Meg Marco on 1/25/08

klean.jpg Meg would like to thank the commenters on this post who recommended the "Klean Kanteen" stainless steel water bottle, as she just ordered one and loves it. Yay. Thank you!



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Post Office Offers Refund In Stamps After Delivering Priority Mail Package F...



 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by CAREY GREENBERG-BERGER on 1/26/08

Old%20Christmas%20Time.jpg"I wanted to let you and my fellow readers know about the agonizing experience I had with the US postal service recently. They didn't quite lose my "2 to 3 day" Priority Mail package, but inexplicably shipped it back and forth across the country for over 5 weeks, missing Christmas by over a week, and then told me I did not deserve a refund!"

I mailed the package on November 27, 2007 via USPS Priority Click-N-Ship from Salt Lake City to Great Neck, NY. It contained heirloom Christmas ornaments and 25-30 year old hand knit Christmas stockings that I was sending to my daughter, as we were spending Christmas at her home this year. Although the package was insured, these items are not really replaceable, so I was very distraught throughout the whole ordeal. The total postage was around $19.

Priority Mail between here and there consistently takes only 2 days, which is exactly what the USPS.com web site says as well if you price the postage. After a week I feared it was lost and started calling, and calling, and calling... Over the next 4 weeks, I made at least 50 phone calls, talked to 18 different USPS employees, including several supervisors (some as many as six times) in Salt Lake City, Denver, Jersey City, NJ, and Great Neck, NY. My package was finally delivered on January 2, 2008 to Great Neck. Here are the search results from the online "Track & Confirm" link, which detail my package's bizarre journey:

Label/Receipt Number: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Detailed Results:

Delivered, January 02, 2008, 1:24 pm, GREAT NECK, NY 11021
Arrival at Unit, January 02, 2008, 8:13 am, GREAT NECK, NY 11021
Processed, December 31, 2007, 10:33 pm, KEARNY, NJ 07032
Processed, December 29, 2007, 3:27 pm, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07097
Processed, December 21, 2007, 9:39 pm, DENVER, CO 80217
Processed, December 16, 2007, 6:46 pm, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07097
Processed, December 07, 2007, 6:44 am, DENVER, CO 80217
Processed, December 02, 2007, 12:02 am, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07097
Electronic Shipping Info Received, November 27, 2007

What happened? I am still trying to find out. The first error occurred in Salt Lake City, where the package was sorted visually by an actual person. My package was put with the bulk mail, which is processed at totally different facilities than the Priority mail. Then, every time it was scanned in Jersey City, it was sent to Denver. No one can explain why this happened. I got the number for the Jersey City bulk mail center and started calling them on December 7, when I saw that it was sent to Denver. No one could explain why it was sent to Denver. What is most baffling to me is that I was told that the scanners do not recognize packages as "Priority", despite the fact the package was prepared online and the barcodes are full of more than enough information to figure out the package is Priority mail! Apparently the postal service does not use their own informational databases to error check their package sorting. If it is incorrectly sorted at the beginning, good luck ever fixing it!

When I explained the the package contained irreplaceable items intended for Christmas, Phil and Richie in Jersey City assured me that they would "flag" the package so it would be manually removed when they got it again. That did not happen, and they sent it to Denver again! By now I was so frustrated that I was in tears. I was calling the Denver bulk mail center and the Jersey City center nearly every day. Lillian, a supervisor in Jersey City, said they had notes all over the facility to look for the package. Finally Phil found it on Saturday, December 29th, called me, and later delivered it to the nearby Priority Mail center.

Both Phil and Lillian claimed that an old UPS label on the bottom of the box was the cause of the problem, but it was not only half torn off, but also blacked out with marker. I am reasonably sure the barcode was not readable by scanner. Besides, Phil admitted the packages are scanned only once at each facility. Since my package was entered into the tracking database every time it was processed, it was obviously scanned correctly and the mutilated UPS label was not the problem. They simply refused to accept any kind of responsibility for their repeated errors.

Every person I talked to in consumer affairs during this ordeal told me I was entitled to a refund, which I certainly agreed with. After the package was finally delivered, I called, explained the situation, and requested a refund. I was told I did not qualify for a refund, because they do not guarantee any delivery except Express Mail! Despite the fact ALL of the literature for Priority Mail says "2 to 3 days", apparently 5 weeks seems like a reasonable timeframe to them. I had to do even more calling, escalating, and fax my copy of the label (even though their own tracking database clearly shows all of the errors they made) to get my refund. After all this, they would only refund me by giving me $19 in stamps, despite the fact I had paid for the label with my credit card on their own web site. As if I ever want to send anything with the USPS again! I contacted my credit card company to initiate a chargeback.

I have learned a few things from this experience:

  • 1. If you really want any accountability, guaranteed delivery times, or solid tracking, don't use USPS.
  • 2. Be sure to plaster Priority Mail labels all over your boxes to make sure they are sorted correctly.
  • 3. Just use FedEx, UPS, or someone else!
In the end, it still seems no one has any idea why it was sent back and forth between Jersey City and Denver in the first place, and they don't really care enough to debug their system so it doesn't happen again.

Thanks for reading!

Really USPS, a refund in stamps? The Post Office can guarantee delivery dates, but only if you shell out a few extra bucks. If you want an extra measure of security, or a refund in greenbacks, you can always use one of the private-sector competitors—but we hear they are no better.

(Photo: The Library of Congress)



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Bloglines - The 27-Hour Day

Bloglines user ncaut (nc_aut@yahoo.com) has sent this item to you, with the following personal message:

Seriously.


Pogue's Posts
A New York Times Blog

The 27-Hour Day

By David Pogue on movies

On-demand movies disappear after 24 hours. It would make a lot more sense to extend that viewing window to 27 hours.


Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Supermarket Trick: Wait One Month Before Using Coupons [Tips]



 
 

Sent to you by David via Google Reader:

 
 

via Consumerist by Chris Walters on 1/23/08

woo hoo cheap hanging cheese!!! Trent at the Simple Dollar describes the "one month coupon strategy"—a cool trick that lets you line up coupons with in-store sales for massive discounts. Set aside grocery coupons for a month, then go through and select the ones you're interested in. Bring them to the store and you'll find that many of them are for products that are now on sale. On Trent's last visit to the supermarket, approximately 40% of the coupons matched on-sale products—in the most extreme example, he was able to purchase some ice cream for 19 cents.

Trent's friend works for Hy-Vee grocery stores and gave him the tip, and he explains why it works:

Coupons in the newspaper are usually the first wave of a product push from large companies. They'll put out coupons to start bumping up the sales, then they'll move onto sale prices later on in the promotion. The reason for doing these in waves is so that the overall product sales trend looks solidly positive and not just a big spike with a fall-off. Plus, coupon users who use the product, like it, return to the store, and notice the item on sale are often willing to buy the item again.

"The One Month Coupon Strategy: A Really Clever Way to Make Coupons Worthwhile" [The Simple Dollar]
(Photo: Brett L.)



 
 

Things you can do from here: